Rode NT1A vs. NT2A | CLEAR WINNER! The results here were noticeably different - the Rode has a slight boost just above the 100Hz mark and in this case it brought-out a slight muddiness in my voice. First up is this little number from Blue Microphones. Don’t be in any doubt, the AT4047 is a professional grade voiceover microphone, and that’s why you’ll pay a bit more for this one over some of the others in the list. If you want to start recording your voiceover sessions from home, then choosing the right microphone is one of the most important decisions you will make. And if a wooden box isn’t the sign of quality and class, I don’t know what is. Sennheiser’s Mk4 microphone comes with a flexible stand mount (a shock-mount is available separately) and a soft cover. I tried the Mk4 earlier this week against the Rode NT-2000, NT2A and K2 ... the Sennheiser was very bright, hard and edgy on a vocal to my ear when compared to the NT-2000 and NT2A. Sennheiser’s Mk4 microphone comes with a flexible stand mount (a shock-mount is available separately) and a soft cover. That it’s not the next mic in the list. After all, you wouldn’t send a plumber to fix a pipe without a good wrench. Both of these mics are Large Diaphragm Condenser (LDC) microphones. Both microphones are robust enough, quiet enough, sensitive enough and neutral enough to be used on just about anything you might want to record. La creme de la creme of condenser microphones. As a added bonus, the Rode K2 will fit the shock mount as well! How to choose a microphone - featuring the Rode NT1-A and Sennheiser Mk4 LDC Microphones. Subjectively, the specs bear out for both mics and nothing that I threw at them bothered either in the slightest. The styling is very contemporary with a satin finish and matt black basket and highlights. You cannot choose a “character” mic for a specific source from a forum or a review, you can however get a pretty good idea about general-use mics. It’s wider and shorter than the Rode and weighs-in at just under 500g. Whilst the actual specs vary a little, both mics are quiet (I’ve got to mention that the specs for the Rode are very, very quiet by the way), will work with high sound pressure levels, are amply sensitive, and have superficially similar frequency response curve shapes (the Rode has an additional little bump at about 120Hz) . Neither has pad, filter nor pattern selection options and both require phantom power. No EQ needed - brilliant. Another plus if you are setting up your studio, is that the NT1 comes with an integrated shock mount and pop-shield, so you don’t have to go shopping around for extra bits. Crisp and detailed, you’ll be getting a well-respected mic that doesn’t exaggerate things from an EQ standpoint. The Rode NT1-A comes in a kit with an elasticated shock-mount (isolates the mic from thuds and rumbles that vibrate up the mic stand), a pop shield to stop plosives (like “B” and “P” sounds), a lead (you can figure that one out) and a soft case, and you also get a 10 year warranty and a booklet and DVD of hints and tips on using your mic. And you wouldn’t send a stripper to a hen do without his Velcro-fastened budgie smugglers. Audio-Technica bill this mic as “warm and smooth”, and a quick look at reviews online will tell you that they aren’t lying. The Rode doesn’t include a lav mic in the box and while they suggest you purchase the Rode Smart Lav to accompany the kit, you can choose any mic you wish, including the ME 2 – II. Finally, I put both mics in front of a guitar cab. Actually, scrap that, the Rode is at the very good end of the budget market. Now, what you are buying here is not a Neumann, and the price reflects that, but the MK4’s diaphragm capsule was designed by the same team behind the industry-pinnacle U87, so you can be sure as shucks it’s going to be a good one. The only downside we can find to this mic? If you want a mic for a specific job, then try lots of mics and pick the one that you can afford that works on your source. We decided to evaluate a number of popular shotgun microphones and we came up with the following list: Sennheiser MKE 600, Audio Technica AT897, Rode NTG2 and Rode NTG3. This, is the ultimate “Magic” Mic. Recorded spoken word tends to be quite telling both because we’re used to hearing people speak anyway, and we do tend to have a certain expectation based on “presenters” voices on TV and radio - the latter often shaped by careful microphone choice. Small differences on paper can make big differences in use, so you really do have to try and see (and hear, obviously). It might have had more in common with the K2 which I also did not like much. A little tidbit for you when considering this microphone – Sennheiser also own Neumann (spoiler alert, see #1). The Shock Mount is actually made very well and is a great improvement over the plastic ones Rode has shipped with their mics in the past. The Rode NT1 is one of the best condenser microphones in this price bracket. The Rode NT2-A is the successor of the extremely popular NT2. No items to compare. An Australian made professional studio condenser microphone designed to deliver clear and … Home Microphone Comparisons Rode NT1A vs. NT2A | CLEAR WINNER! Right then, let’s take a look at the “useful for everything” category. If you want a mic to do lots of different jobs, then pick one that avoids extreme “sound sculpting”. It is manufactured in Germany. 4. The Gold standard. read ... not familiar with double bass for classical. Updated 9/6/19. Microphone Shootout - Sennheiser Mk4 vs Rhode NTK vs Royer Ribbon by RussW8 published on 2012-10-31T06:06:21Z Hey there, I have decided there is not enough shootouts of any quality online … It’s wider and shorter than the Rode and weighs-in at just under 500g. All-in-all, a great mic for a very reasonable price. Similarly, if you have a higher pitched “little voice” like Jane Horrocks, you will want a mic with a higher dynamic range. Rode NT2a Questions . It is manufactured in Australia. You can simply adjust the volume level and use the wind cut switches to make it fuller and richer. ... sounded pretty harsh in samples i heard while i know the nt2a is smoother so that could be good idk. It has nice clean high frequencies without being too shrill, and it is built like a rock, so durability won’t be an issue. The crucial microphone question is “what do I want to do with this mic?” Do you want it for a specific job or do you want one that will handle lots of different tasks well? Both recommended. I put both mics in front of a couple of singers and asked them to choose purely on appearance and feel, one chose the Sennheiser, the other loved the Rode - clearly beauty is in the eyes of the beholder.